|
AIMS
Let's get this clear from the start. Your aim is to fill up the lesson
time. If this aim remains unfulfilled, your sub-aims are merely
pissing in the wind. Keep on your guard for waffly arguments
concerning the difference between aims and objectives. These, as with
most TEFL discussions, lead nowhere. If ever requested to comment on
someone's lesson you have observed, the TEFL bluffer should pipe up
'But do you feel you have achieved your aim?' In response, you will
receive a pitiful justification for all manner of guff.
BUZZ GROUP
Usually employed in a WORKSHOP when the TRAINER has a degree in
sociology from Essex University. A nasty little device
employed by the legendary IH TRAINER who unfurled a giant roll
of paper, announced 'You're going to create the biggest mind map
you've ever seen' and promptly headed for the bar. Twaddle in extremis
and a fine example for all TEFL bluffers.
COMMUNICATION
TEFL's most sacred word and the barometer for all
classroom atrocities. The Communicative Approach was designed for
those who can't handle grammar and who never grew out of Blue
Peter. To win the hearts of your TEFL buddie look critically at any
coursebook activity and intone: 'Hmmm, not very communicative is it?'
Communicative is such a vague woolly term that it can be exploited to
advantage on numerous occasions. Even though no one can
adequately define it, it is of course 'a jolly good thing'.
THE ECLECTIC APPROACH
Cluelessness elevated to an art form. The bluffer will
naturally adopt an eclectic approach to everything.
ELICIT
This means 'get an answer'. TEFLers do not like asking,
because: 1) 'ask' has only one syllable (sorry, is monosyllabic) and
therefore sounds insufficiently pseudoscientific, 2) 'eliciting'
wastes more time than asking and 3) a bona fide TEFLer has no answers
as he/she is a FACILITATOR and has nothing of value to impart.
FACILITATOR
Remember at all times that you are a facilitator, a
counsellor, an elicitor - anything but a teacher. Teaching is
definitely a no-no in TEFLspeak. Avoid the term at all costs.
ERROR CORRECTION
Current orthodoxy has it that error correction is much
neglected. This is the line of argument a bluffer should take. In
truth, however, it is highly knackering and totally ineffective, so no
one bothers with it. Nonetheless, a good time-wasting activity is a
bit of 'creative error correction' - the technique of inventing errors
for on-board correction. A useful sleight of hand to follow
MONITORING.
FEEDBACK
In the good old days, 'feedback' was what
happened when Jimi Hendrix put his guitar near an amplifier. In
TEFLspeak, however, it involves embarrassed students reporting back
with mind-numbingly dull information like, 'We found that 5 people
have never climbed Everest, 4 people have eaten octopus and everybody
thinks the teacher is a cretin.'
FILLERS
Everything in TEFL is a filler. Officially declared
'fillers' are simply less successful (i.e. less time-consuming) than
other twaddle.
INDIVIDUALISATION
A useful buzz word easily dropped into TEFL
conversations. Instant justification for sloping off to have a fag and
a cup of coffee while the fee-paying customers become autonomous. If
you're really lucky, they might even leave the building.
LEARNER TRAINING
Everybody knows, but naturally refuses to admit,
that this is a completeoad of drivel. LT has been flavour of the month
for over a decade which is a highly depressing thought in itself.
Nevertheless, it is a cardinal sin for the TEFL bluffer to knock LT in
any shape or form because otherwise you will become embroiled in the
sort of tedious argument best avoided. Should the subject of LT raise
its ugly head, nod sagely and say something enigmatic like 'Learner
Training is all right in theory. The problem lies in the methodology.'
Do not expand on this. LT comes in handy for scoring TEFL brownie
points in a WORKSHOP. Regardless of the subject under discussion, bang
your fist down firmly on the table and declare: 'Don't forget the
Learner Training!' Your audience will be suitably impressed.
LESSON PLANS
Nobody in their right mind writes lesson plans
unless they are being subjected to an OBSERVED LESSON. You can easily
justify a lack of lesson plan by arguing that your lessons are
flexible and needs-responsive. Hence, they cannot be mapped out in
advance. In this context, you can espouse the ECLECTIC APPROACH.
MINGLERS
Time-wasting par excellence. Not only does
the student ask the same dull questions to his neighbour, he has to
ask 18 other people as well. Why waste 2 people's time when you can
waste 20?
OBSERVED LESSON
TEFLers often panic needlessly about these. The
TEFL bluffer should have a standard observed lesson up his/her sleeve
to wheel out whenever observation threatens. Bluffer's tip: teach them
something they already know hence making your AIMS a fait accompli.
Should your part in this farce be that of an observer, your first
comment should (in true post-coital fashion) be 'How was it for you?'
SELF-ACCESS
Always bear in mind that self-access is ipso
facto a 'good thing' because it is associated with INDIVIDUALISATION.
The cognoscenti know that the proliferation of SA centres is tacit
recognition of the fact that TEFLers are dispensable. TEFLers know
nothing about language because they have degrees in geology.
SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS
A complete misnomer. Should really be entitled
'self-interest groups'. For really dedicated brown-nosers and terminal
cases only.
STUDENT-TEACHER INTERACTION
This is a charade associated with LESSON
PLANNING and involves drawing pathetic little arrows from T to Ss or
vice versa. Naturally, these have no connection with reality and serve
a purely decorative function |